Basilisk ii g3 rom install#

It is possible that some new features or tweaks are missing. Instead, I copied the configure and config.h.in files from an earlier source version. I came up with some kind of workaround: I did not run autogen.sh.

Basilisk ii g3 rom install#

If you installed as 'Software Development', did you install additional tools or libraries?ĭid you use a fresh BasiliskII folder? (I.e., one without a configure file so you have to run autogen.sh) I can't guide you through what you need to install, it is to complicated to remember and thus explain.ĭid you install Fedora as 'Desktop' or 'Software Development'? That strenghtens my conviction that something is wrong in your development chain of tools. (I do not remember where I got the old source files.)Ĭat_7 wrote:EDIT: I have just installed fedora 14 invmware and compiled basiliskII succesfully. I had no problems compiling from a 5 (?) year old source files with F14 or SL6b1. I tried with Fedora 14 and Scientific Linux 6 beta 1, and both were installed as 'software development workstations'. noĬonfigure: WARNING: xxxxxxxxxx.h: present but cannot be compiledĬonfigure: WARNING: xxxxxxxxxx.h: check for missing prerequisite headers?Ĭonfigure: WARNING: xxxxxxxxxx.h: see the Autoconf documentationĬonfigure: WARNING: xxxxxxxxxx.h: section 'Present But Cannot Be Compiled'Ĭonfigure: WARNING: xxxxxxxxxx.h: proceeding with the compiler's resultĬonfigure: WARNING: # - #Ĭonfigure: WARNING: # Report this to Christian.Bauer ( ) #Īll usability checks reported 'no' although most of the presence checks reported 'yes'.

Code: Select all checking xxxxxxxxxx.h usability.